Eragon

Aug. 2nd, 2009 09:11 pm
stephbg: I made this! (Default)
[personal profile] stephbg
Inertia led me to watch Eragon this evening. It was probably not helped by rough cutting for commercial breaks, but it wasn't great material to start with (not that I've read the novel). Nor was it nearly as bad as I was expecting.



It probably would have helped significantly if the male lead had possessed any form of charisma. I think I was supposed to care if he lived or died (beyond the fate of his dragon). At least he wasn't too pouty, but I could have done with some phwoar.

Jeremy Irons managed to keep a straight face, but Malkovich was completed wasted.

I got nervous when they started talking about elves and dwarves, but the budget didn't seem to stretch that far so we didn't see them.

Some of the horses were very nice.

That's about it.

Date: 2009-08-02 03:11 pm (UTC)
ext_54569: starbuck (Default)
From: [identity profile] purrdence.livejournal.com
There's always the Eragon drinking game. One slip every time you see something ripped off from a previous movie or story. Guaranteed to get you smashed within the first 30 minutes.

Date: 2009-08-12 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drhoz.livejournal.com
hell, play the Eragon/Star Wars game - Purrdence and I were helpless with giggles during the screening of this movie, because of the blatant rip-offs from the Star Wars - A New Hope plot

Date: 2009-08-03 12:28 am (UTC)
ext_3536: A close up of a green dragon's head, gentle looking with slight wisps of smoke from its nostrils. (Default)
From: [identity profile] leecetheartist.livejournal.com
Eragon was *dreadful*. And that was seeing it with a riff track.

The dragon managed to look constipated - and not much else whenever it was telepathically speaking.

It's saying all this incredible stuff, and it looks like the only thing going through its head is "hmmm...I wonder if I'm eggbound".

Date: 2009-08-03 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talmor.livejournal.com
The comparison with the book was really interesting - the books were written by a teenager (14? 16?), and it does show. For one, the main female character was tough, strong, confident, brilliant, and completely in control of the 'relationship' (which was that he was infatuated with her, and she gently pointed out that she was immortal and a princess, and he wasn't).

In short, in the book written by a teenage boy, the female character was exactly how teenage boys see the opposite sex - completely in control, and scary as hell.

In the movie, the corresponding character was a classic hollywood love-interest, with zero involvment other than being pretty and female and there to be rescued, then fall in love with the lead...

Profile

stephbg: I made this! (Default)
stephbg

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 01:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios