stephbg: I made this! (Default)
[personal profile] stephbg
I was told that The Steel Remains by Richard Morgan was a fantasy genre-busting, extremely violent thrill ride etc etc. This is not why I read it. RM also happens to be the author of one of my favourite SF/detective books Altered Carbon, and as a recent GoH at Swancon, he was a seriously cool, intelligent and interesting Dude.

I also stopped reading fantasy some years ago, bored by the heavy repetition (NAFE).



Expectations are interesting things. I kept waiting for the outrageously bloody and violent bits, but they never seemed to come. I clearly have a high tolerance for (appropriate and well written) gore, but the fight scenes didn't announce themselves as Fight Scenes and it all seemed internally consistent. Consistency of tone is very important to me.

If a lot of people are waving sharp pointy things around, someone will lose an eye. And an eyebrow, half an ear, and a chunk of cheek. Oops. If the action had been a bit slower, I'm sure lingering infections would have taken out many of the survivors.

As for the shattered fantasy tropes, I was too busy reading to notice them. This is a Good Thing.

The gay sex was well-executed, I'm told. I could have done with a bit less of it, and the story wouldn't have suffered; the same applies to the het sex in RM's other work. I'm not sure the hero-is-gay-therefore-a-partial-outcast-even-though-he's-nobility quite works as a plot device. RM said it gave Ringil a reason to care about the little people, but his war fatigue seemed to be a perfectly good reason for that. War is stupid, after all.

I admit quite freely that I suffered from occasional who's-the-guy?/which-city-was-that?/what-race-are-we-talking-about-now? -itis. That certainly made it feel like a fantasy novel :-)

Did the multiple character threads weave together into a seamless narrative core for the climax? Not notably. Names were dropped so we all knew the protagonists knew each other, but the final rendezvous was abrupt and lacked a sense of inevitability (maybe on purpose?). Peter F. Hamilton multi-threads and weaves particularly well, but it's a new thing for RM. We'll see if he improves.

In summary it was well done and I liked it a lot, and will certainly read the next one, although I'm aware it will probably take a while to get to print.

Date: 2009-04-23 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
It was OK, but the 'nasty fantasy that subverts standard fantasy tropes' was done better by Joe Abercrombie, IMO. And RM is not fooling anyone except maybe himself with the 'each book is a proper self-contained book, no really' stance. But not bad, I'll read the next few, and I hope they get more interesting.

The Steel Remains

Date: 2009-04-23 02:22 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Done better by Joe Abercrombie" - guess that's a matter of opinion. I thought Abercrombie's book a bit too Monty Python. Like The Steel Remains far better, as I felt more emotions from Richard's characters. But have to admit I read each character's story (I skipped every other chapter)first, then went back and read the entire thing as written. My mind works better that way. Plus I NEVER pay attention to things like "fantasy that subverts standard tropes" - that puts too much expectations on what a book might really be.

For fans of Richards Takeshi Kovacs books, someone has pointed out that the sky dweller Takavac might be an in-house take on Takeshi Kovacs. Read the paragraph where he says he's changed flesh and traveled in a spirit form to a dozen worlds really makes sense. If that's that case, very clever!

Date: 2009-04-23 02:20 pm (UTC)
ext_54529: (Default)
From: [identity profile] shrydar.livejournal.com
I did find the final rendezvous a little contrived and sudden, and I'm hoping to see a lot more of the non-Ringil protagonists in the later books. But yes, overall I liked.

Bloody-and-violent's an interesting one. I rewatched Pulp Fiction fairly recently because I wanted something bloody and violent with loads of complicated interweaving threads, and compared to my recollection of my first viewing it failed miserably on both counts. Hardly any characters to keep track of, and very little in the way of explicit violence.

Date: 2009-04-23 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephbg.livejournal.com
Pulp Fiction is a couples' movie :-)

Date: 2009-04-23 02:40 pm (UTC)
ext_54569: starbuck (Default)
From: [identity profile] purrdence.livejournal.com
I'm halfway through reading it now.

Funny thing is, I initially had no interest in reading it. The blurbs I read about it did not tweak my fancy. But the moment it was revealed in the Sexuality... panel at Swancon that there was Hot Gay Sex in it? Wooho!! What can I say, I'm a sucker for man on man action.

Date: 2009-04-23 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephbg.livejournal.com
You're welcome to my share of the HGS.

Date: 2009-04-23 02:51 pm (UTC)

Profile

stephbg: I made this! (Default)
stephbg

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 03:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios